Please look at this summary of a University of Buffalo study headed by Dr. John Violanti, the pioneer in learning and teaching about police officer suicide. As Dr. Kevin Gilmartin has been trying to tell us for two decades, the police job exerts powerful physiological and emotional stresses on police. We go to his lectures but we don’t act. Officers cannot manage these stresses alone with the current resources available to them. The organization has to help.
Police do an incomparably good job of incorporating new techniques and technology to conduct safe as well as tactically superior police operations. How? Training and investing attention, energy and resources. Simultaneously we do just about nothing to help officers survive the forces that lead to more officer deaths than do active duty encounters with speeding cars and armed bad guys. We need to incorporate technology and techniques that can become as institutionally accepted as the radio receiver on the epaulet. (Remember officers in many places fought the introduction of the portable radio. They saw it as a tool for the Administration to snoop on them.)
Let’s borrow from our special ops units the technique of after-action discussions. Why not start today and work with unions, in union states, to do something like the following starting with supervisors and the PO’s and detectives they supervise?
Supervisors conduct individual weekly listening sessions with their personnel on what they learned in their work during the previous week and how they can improve practice. In talking about wheat they did personnel will throw out lots clues about how the week’s craziness has affected them. The active listening will naturally lead officers to talk. Maybe not at the first session, but by the third. The sessions would give the sergeants a chance to assess the total person and how he or she is changing.
You don’t need to formalize it beyond that. Men, especially, don’t like to go to the doctor. The police culture is a male culture, with women making up only 10% or so of the profession. Get too formal and you’ll get the backlash from people raised in the police family to suck it up and move on.
It’s not radically new. As early as 1923 August Vollmer conducted sessions he called “The Friday Crab Club,” at which members of the Berkeley PD were encouraged to come and talk about whatever work-related stuff was on their minds. Start simple and build on the ideas that emerge from the active listening.
Summary of the Violanti Study:
Police Officer Stress Creates Significant Health Risks Compared to General Population, Study Finds
Landmark study of police officers in Buffalo, N.Y., reveals increased incidence of chronic disease, finds suicides higher among those still working
Release Date: July 9, 2012
BUFFALO, N.Y. — The daily psychological stresses that police officers experience in their work put them at significantly higher risk than the general population for a host of long-term physical and mental health effects. That’s the overall finding of a major scientific study of the Buffalo Police Department called Buffalo Cardio-Metabolic Occupational Police Stress (BCOPS) conducted over five years by a University at Buffalo researcher.
“This is one of the first police population-based studies to test the association between the stress of being a police officer and psychological and health outcomes,” says John Violanti, PhD, professor of social and preventive medicine in the UB School of Public Health and Health Professions, and principal investigator on the study, funded by the National Institutes of Health.
“Usually, health disparities are defined by socioeconomic and ethnic factors, but here you have a disparity caused by an occupation,” says UB’s Violanti.
The research, which is in press this month in a special issue of the International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, reveals connections between the daily stressors of police work and obesity, suicide, sleeplessness and cancer, as well as general health disparities between police officers and the general population.
The study was prompted by the assumption that the danger, high demands and exposure to human misery and death that police officers experience on the job contribute to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and other chronic health outcomes.
“We wanted to know, in addition to stress, what are other contributing factors that lead to cardiovascular disease in police?,” says Violanti, a former New York State trooper.
The study found, for example, that shift work is a contributing factor to an increase in metabolic syndrome, which is a cluster of symptoms that includes abdominal obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes and stroke. Nearly half (46.9 percent) of officers in the BCOPS study worked a non-day shift compared to just 9 percent of U.S. workers.
“We found that as a group, officers who work nights have a higher risk of metabolic syndrome than those who work day shifts,” says Violanti.
Four-hundred-sixty-four police officers participated in the study. Among the findings:
— 40 percent of the officers were obese, compared with 32 percent of the general population
— more than 25 percent of the officers had metabolic syndrome, a cluster of symptoms believed to increase the risk of heart disease, stroke and diabetes, versus 18.7 percent of the general population
— female and male officers experiencing the highest level of self-reported stress were four- and six-times more likely to have poor sleep quality, respectively
— officers were at increased risk of developing Hodgkin’s lymphoma and brain cancer after 30 years of service.
— Suicide rates were more than eight times higher in working officers than they were in officers who had retired or left the police force.
“This finding challenges the common assumption that separated or retired officers are at increased risk for suicide,” says Violanti, noting, however, that the need for suicide prevention efforts remains important for both active and retired officers.
The BCOPS findings demonstrate that police work by itself can put officers at risk for adverse health outcomes.
“Usually, health disparities are defined by socioeconomic and ethnic factors, but here you have a health disparity caused by an occupation,” says Violanti, “highlighting the need to expand the definition of health disparity to include occupation as well.”
Violanti adds that while police officers do have health insurance, the culture of police work often goes against the goal of improving health.
“The police culture doesn’t look favorably on people who have problems,” he says. “Not only are you supposed to be superhuman if you’re an officer, but you fear asking for help.” Police officers who reveal that they suffer from a chronic disease or health problem may lose financial status, professional reputation or both, he explains.
“If you have heart disease, you may not be allowed to go back on the street,” he says. “That’s a real threat. If you go for mental health counseling, you may not be considered for promotions and you may be shamed by your peers and superiors. In some cases, your gun can be taken away, so there is a real fear of going for help.”
The answer, Violanti says, is to change the training of officers in police academy so they understand signs of stress and how to get them treated.
“Police recruits need to receive inoculation training against stress,” says Violanti. “If I tell you that the first time you see a dead body or an abused child that it is normal to have feelings of stress, you will be better able to deal with them; exposure to this type of training inoculates you so that when it does happen, you will be better prepared. At the same time, middle and upper management in police departments need to be trained in how to accept officers who ask for help and how to make sure that officers are not afraid to ask for that help,” he says.
The BCOPS study is based on extensive and rigorous medical testing and integrates a broad range of psychological, physiological and subclinical measures of stress, allowing for correlations between on-the-job stress and stress biomarkers that reveal the potential for adverse mental and physical health outcomes.
Violanti and his co-authors note: “This study would not have been possible without the cooperation of the Buffalo Police Department administration, the Police Benevolent Association and the exceptional men and women of the Buffalo Police Department. Our sincere thanks to them, as we look forward to our follow-up study.”
Co-authors with Violanti were: Michael E. Andrew, Cecil M. Burchfiel, Luenda E. Charles, Desta Fekedulegn, Ja Kook Gu, Tara Hartley, Clauda Ma, Anna Mnatsakanova, all from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as Lindsay M. Smith of West Virginia University, James E. Slaven of Indiana University and Bryan J. Vila of Washington State University.
In addition to Violanti, co-investigators on BCOPS are Jean Wactawski-Wende, PhD, professor of social and preventive medicine and vice provost for strategic initiatives at UB and Joan Dorn, PhD, professor emeritus of exercise and nutrition sciences, both in the UB School of Public Health and Health Professions, John Vena of the University of Georgia, Athens and Bryan Vila.